After reading through my peers
answer to their question I realized how well constructed Stephanie’s was. Not only did she answer the question that was
asked, she was able to elaborate on them.
Elaborating on something sometimes-just leads to talking in a circle,
however, hers did not. She expanded and
went deeper into the thoughts rather than just simply answering the
question. This is really important to
do because it shows the reader that you understand the question being
asked. When you take it to the next
level, you interpret something and are able to construct your own opinion about
things and show that. Reading through
others answers made me realize that you have to not just answer what the question
is asking. When you put your own opinion
on things, it makes a lot more sense.
Being able
to predict what questions could be on a test is hard, especially when you don’t
know what is important and what’s not important. To predict, you need to comprehend the
information. I tried predicting some
questions on an exam this past week and it was a success. I had to understand the main ideas and
construct questions that would not only cover the main idea, but also allow me
to show that I was able to really understand the concept behind the idea.
Predicting
test questions may not always work, but even if you don’t predict the exact
question, you are still able to answer questions to do with the main idea. You have the supporting evidence you need to
construct a proper answer. I will be
using this study method much more often now that I know how to do it
correctly.
No comments:
Post a Comment